江苏省科技期刊可视化阅读平台

导航条

《江苏科技信息》杂志社 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (18): 64-66.doi: 10.1004-7530/2022-39-18-64

• 科教研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于层次分析法的线上教学评价研究

庄倩倩   

  1. 吉林农业科技学院 农学院,吉林 吉林 132101
  • 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-25
  • 作者简介:庄倩倩(1984—),女,吉林白山人,讲师,博士;研究方向:高校教学改革。
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省职业技术教育学会2020年度科研课题;项目名称:基于层次分析法的《园林树木学》线上教学评价及实践研究;项目编号:2020XHY179。

Research on online teaching evaluation based on AHP

Zhuang Qianqian   

  1. College of Agricultural, Jilin Agricultural Science and Technology University, Jilin 132101, China
  • Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-25

PDF

755

摘要： 由于新冠肺炎疫情影响,高校的线上教学模式成为疫情期间最广泛、最有效开展教学的手段和方式。为了探究线上教学各要素对教学效果的影响,文章应用层次分析法,建立了线上课程评价体系。通过发放调查问卷、课堂测试等形式收集关键数据,对课程评价体系中的各级指标进行权重计算。针对各指标的权重结果与教学实际联系进行分析,得出结论认为学生自身特性、教师自身特性及授课方法指标对教学效果的影响较大,而授课内容、网络平台等指标对教学效果的影响较小。此外,研究发现,授课方法、授课方式等指标也与授课内容、网络情况等存在密切联系,其权重值存在特殊情况下发生变化的可能性。

关键词: 层次分析法, 线上教学, 教学评价

Abstract: Due to the recent impact of COVID-19, online teaching mode in universities has become the most extensive and effective means and way to carry out teaching during the epidemic. To explore online teaching factor’s influence on the teaching effect, this study using online teaching as the research object, applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), established the evaluation system, through questionnaires, classroom test form such as key data collection, calculated all levels of index weight of curriculum evaluation system. In view of the weight results of each indicator and the relation to teaching practice, the author analyzes and concludes that students’ own characteristics, teachers’ own characteristics and teaching methods have a greater impact on teaching effect, while teaching content, network platform and other indicators have a smaller impact on teaching effect. In addition, the study found that teaching methods, teaching ways and other indicators are closely related to teaching content and network conditions, and their weight values may change under special circumstances.

Key words: Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP), online teaching, teaching evaluation

中图分类号: